tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22646012.post8863289911789425768..comments2023-11-04T00:19:12.362+11:00Comments on I'm ramblin' again: Born Twice #7: To not Trivialize Sin.Justinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04773963984084893424noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22646012.post-76628254016258163252008-05-22T13:51:00.000+10:002008-05-22T13:51:00.000+10:00Brilliant. Sin is not the flu or Cancer. It has al...Brilliant. Sin is not the flu or Cancer. It has already claimed a life.<BR/><BR/>Oh my. Great insight. Powerful stuff.Jimhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01889467446441763139noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22646012.post-71406816527464700802008-05-22T00:23:00.000+10:002008-05-22T00:23:00.000+10:00spoon boy says: "Do not try and bend the spoon (or...<A HREF="http://www.ix625.com/matrixscript.html" REL="nofollow">spoon boy says</A>: "Do not try and bend the spoon (or fork). That's impossible. Instead only try to realize the truth."<BR/><BR/>Neo: What truth?<BR/>Spoon boy: There is no spoon (or fork).<BR/>Neo: There is no spoon (or fork)?<BR/>Spoon boy: Then you'll see that it is not the spoon (or fork) that bends, it is only yourself.<BR/><BR/>Isn't the whole "dead in sins" thing a bit ... macabre/dark? <BR/><BR/>I mean birth doesn't take place because the pre-born one was dead, does it? I mean must the relatively positive "born again" be thought of as necessary because of sins/death? Does one get that impression from the conversation under discussion--the one between Nic and Jesus? Or is that an extrapolation?Benjamin Adyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03325520894212279303noreply@blogger.com